FB pixel

UK digital ID inclusivity can benefit from biometric bias testing consistency

Awareness of accessibility standard also needed, OfDIA says
UK digital ID inclusivity can benefit from biometric bias testing consistency
 

More than a quarter of digital identity service providers certified under the UK’s Digital Identity and Attributes Trust Framework (DIATF) were not even aware of the accessibility standard that they are expected to adhere to. Biometrics providers also do not assess bias the same way, which led to the addition of more specific testing requirements in the latest version of the trust framework (0.4).

This is a finding of the UK’s Office for Digital Identities and Attributes (OfDIA) in its second annual inclusion monitoring report. The report was originally published in November, and OfDIA’s advice drawn from it is shared in a blog post published Thursday.

OfDIA recommends that the government strengthen the accessibility rules in the DIATF, and that services make it easier to accommodate vouching.

More than half of services, 54 percent, reported meeting or surpassing W3C’s Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 (AA). But 27 percent said they were unaware of the requirement.

Service providers variously assess their biometrics for bias with operational testing, scenario testing and technology testing, in roughly equal measure, and 5 percent say they do not perform any bias testing at all. Several respondents admitted they did not know if any testing was done on their biometrics for demographic differentials. Face biometrics are the modality used by 92 percent of vendor respondents.

Internal testing based on an established standard was the most popular methodology, followed by external independent testing by an accredited test laboratory. Despite this only 30 percent have data on the accuracy rates of their technology with different demographic groups.

OfDIA also shared plans for improving the inclusion survey in 2025. They include new questions on whether reusable digital identities are offered, whether the service is cloud- or device-based, the average number of customers and checks conducted each month and how data on drop-outs or unsuccessful checks is collected.

The deadline for completing the 2025 survey is March 3.

Related Posts

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Biometrics providers and systems evolve or get left behind

Biometrics are allowing people to prove who they are, speeding journeys through airports, and enabling anonymous online proof of age,…

 

Findynet funding development of six digital wallet solutions

Finnish public-private cooperative Findynet has announced it will award 60,000 euros (US$69,200) to six digital wallet vendors to help translate…

 

Patchwork of age check, online safety legislation grows across US

As the U.S. waits for the Supreme Court’s opinion on the Texas case of Paxton v. Free Speech Coalition, which…

 

AVPA laud findings from age assurance tech trial

The Age Verification Providers Association (AVPA), and several of its members, have welcomed the publication of preliminary findings from the…

 

Sri Lanka to launch govt API policies and guidelines

Sri Lanka’s government, in the wake of its digital economy drive, is gearing up to release application programming interface (API)…

 

Netherlands’ asylum seeker ID cards from Idemia use vertical ICAO format

The Netherlands will introduce new identity documents for asylum seekers Idemia Smart Identity, compliant with the ICAO specification for vertical…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events